Or Lecture #10, depending on how pedantic you are. It’s not like
it really matters. We missed a week because of a public holiday. I hope I’m not
confusing you too much. Gosh settle down it’s not a big deal, stop freaking out
about it. Please calm yourself.
Thanks.
So in this lecture we talked about Agenda Setting – how
the media constructs reality. Agenda setting originated from around 1968 during
the Chapel Hill campaign in which there was a survey of undecided voters.
Basically, there are four basic agendas which are all
pretty self-explanatory.
·
The Public
Agenda
·
The Policy
Agenda
·
The Corporate
Agenda
·
The Media
Agenda
All of these agendas, while for the most part remain
separated, are interrelated and can’t really function without each other.
There are also 2 basic assumptions about agenda setting,
and they are:
1. Mass
media do not simply reflect reality, they filter and shape it AND
2. Media
concentration leads the public to place higher importance on something.
So basically,
The more coverage an issue receives, the
more important it is to people.
The main thing we covered, however, was the Agenda Setting Family, which consists
of:
MEDIA GATEKEEPING
This is how individuals control the flow of information
through a channel, and has a lot to do with exposure and what is revealed.
MEDIA ADVOCACY
The purposive promotion of a message
AGENDA CUTTING
If something is given less time in the media, it’s given
less importance. The example used was that the AIDS epidemic in Africa took a
backseat in the news to Justin Bieber’s new haircut due to the fact that the
epidemic simply isn’t given as much time in the news spotlight.
AGENDA
SURFING/BANDWAGON EFFECT
This element of the family mainly relates to following
the trends in the media, and public opinion influencing others.
DIFFUSION OF NEWS
Who decides how, where and when news is released? This is
the process through which an event is communicated to the public.
PORTRAYAL OF AN
ISSUE
The way an issue is portrayed will influence the public
perception. For example, the way that aboriginal issues are portrayed in
Australian media heavily mould the way many citizens approach the matter.
MEDIA DEPENDENCE
In this day and age, more and more people are becoming
increasingly dependent on the media and technology. Therefore, the more
dependent people are on media, the more susceptible to agenda setting.
Finally, we looked over the strengths and weaknesses of
Agenda Setting Theory, which were all pretty basic and for the most part were
common sense.
|
Strengths
|
Weaknesses
|
|
Explanatory power
|
Public may not be the ideal audience
|
|
Predictive power
|
The effect is weakened on steadfast minds
|
|
Organising power
|
Can’t create or conceal problems
|
|
Can be proven false
|
New media is weakening agenda setting
|
|
Scientific facts/research
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment